您的位置: 标准下载 » 国际标准 » DIN 德国标准 »

DIN 1826-1977 圆柱齿轮用插齿刀.直齿轮用加大毂形齿轮刀具

时间:2024-05-17 23:35:10 来源: 标准资料网 作者:标准资料网 阅读:8067
下载地址: 点击此处下载
【英文标准名称】:Pinion-typecuttersforcylindricalgears;extendedhubgearcuttersforspurgears
【原文标准名称】:圆柱齿轮用插齿刀.直齿轮用加大毂形齿轮刀具
【标准号】:DIN1826-1977
【标准状态】:现行
【国别】:德国
【发布日期】:1977-11
【实施或试行日期】:
【发布单位】:德国标准化学会(DIN)
【起草单位】:
【标准类型】:()
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:齿轮齿;作标记;工具;小型齿轮铣刀;材料;公差;设计;尺寸;正齿轮;硬度
【英文主题词】:Design;Dimensions;Hardness;Marking;Materials;Pinion-typecutters;Spurgears;Teethofgears;Tolerances(measurement);Tools
【摘要】:Pinion-typecuttersforcylindricalgears;extendedhubgearcuttersforspurgears
【中国标准分类号】:J41
【国际标准分类号】:25_100_01
【页数】:3P;A4
【正文语种】:德语


基本信息
标准名称:城市轨道交通自动售检票系统通用技术规范
英文名称:General technical specification for automatic fare collection system of urban rail transit
中标分类: 工程建设 >> 城乡规划与市政工程 >> 城市交通工程
ICS分类: 建筑材料和建筑物 >> 自然规划、城市规划
替代情况:被DGJ 08-1101-2007代替
发布日期:2005-01-10
实施日期:2005-02-01
首发日期:
作废日期:
出版日期:
页数:114页
适用范围

没有内容

前言

没有内容

目录

没有内容

引用标准

没有内容

所属分类: 工程建设 城乡规划与市政工程 城市交通工程 建筑材料和建筑物 自然规划 城市规划
【英文标准名称】:StandardClassificationforServiceabilityofanOfficeFacilityforMeetingsandGroupEffectiveness
【原文标准名称】:办公设备对于会议和聚会效果的适用性标准分类
【标准号】:ASTME1661-1995a(2005)
【标准状态】:现行
【国别】:
【发布日期】:1995
【实施或试行日期】:
【发布单位】:美国材料与试验协会(US-ASTM)
【起草单位】:E06.25
【标准类型】:(Classification)
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:办公设备适用性;办公室;分类标准;会议效果;聚会效果;会议;分类;可行性
【英文主题词】:acousticseparation;building;conferencerooms;facility;facilityoccupants;function;meetingrooms;office;performance;rating;ratingscale;requirements;serviceability;work-rooms
【摘要】:EachFacilityRatingScale(seeFigs.1-4)inthisclassificationprovidesameanstoestimatethelevelofserviceabilityofabuildingorfacilityforonetopicofserviceabilityandtocomparethatlevelagainstthelevelofanyotherbuildingorfacility.Thisclassificationcanbeusedforcomparinghowwelldifferentbuildingsorfacilitiesmeetaparticularrequirementforserviceability.Itisapplicabledespitedifferencessuchaslocation,structure,mechanicalsystems,age,andbuildingshape.Thisclassificationcanbeusedtoestimatetheamountofvarianceofserviceabilityfromtargetorfromrequirement,forasingleofficefacility,orwithinagroupofofficefacilities.Thisclassificationcanbeusedtoestimatethefollowing:4.4.1Serviceabilityofanexistingfacilityforusesotherthanitspresentuse.4.4.2Serviceability(potential)ofafacilitythathasbeenplannedbutnotyetbuilt.4.4.3Serviceability(potential)ofafacilityforwhicharemodelinghasbeenplanned.Useofthisclassificationdoesnotresultinbuildingevaluationordiagnosis.Buildingevaluationordiagnosisgenerallyrequiresaspecialexpertiseinbuildingengineeringortechnologyandtheuseofinstruments,tools,ormeasurements.Thisclassificationappliesonlytofacilitiesthatarebuildingconstructions,orpartsthereof.(Whilethisclassificationmaybeusefulinratingtheserviceabilityoffacilitiesthatarenotbuildingconstructions,suchfacilitiesareoutsidethescopeofthisclassification.)Thisclassificationisnotintendedfor,andisnotsuitablefor,useforregulatorypurposes,norforfirehazardassessmentnorforfireriskassessment.1.1Thisclassificationcoverspairsofscalesforclassifyinganaspectoftheserviceabilityofanofficefacility,thatis,thecapabilityofanofficefacilitytomeetcertainpossiblerequirementstoenableworkgroupsorprojectgroupstofunctioneffectivelyandproductively.1.2Withinthataspectofserviceability,eachpairofscales,shownin,areforclassifyingonetopicofserviceability.EachparagraphinanOccupantRequirementScale(see)summarizesonelevelofserviceabilityonthattopic,whichoccupantsmightrequire.ThematchingentryintheFacilityRatingScale(see)isatranslationoftherequirementintoadescriptionofcertainfeaturesofafacilitywhich,takenincombination,indicatethatthefacilityislikelytomeetthatlevelofrequiredserviceability.1.3TheentriesintheFacilityRatingScale(see)areindicativeandnotcomprehensive.Theyareforquickscanningtoestimateapproximately,quickly,andeconomically,howwellanofficefacilityislikelytomeettheneedsofoneoranothertypeofoccupantgroupovertime.Theentriesarenotformeasuring,knowing,orevaluatinghowanofficefacilityisperforming.1.4Thisclassificationcanbeusedtoestimatethelevelofserviceabilityofanexistingfacility.Itcanalsobeusedtoestimatetheserviceabilityofafacilitythathasbeenplannedbutnotyetbuilt,suchasoneforwhichsingle-linedrawingsandoutlinespecificationshavebeenprepared.1.5Thisclassificationindicateswhatwouldcauseafacilitytoberatedatacertainlevelofserviceabilitybutdoesnotstatehowtoconductaserviceabilityratingnorhowtoassignaserviceabilityscore.ThatinformationisfoundinPracticeE1334.ThescalesinthisclassificationarecomplimentarytoandcompatiblewithPracticeE1334.Eachrequirestheother.
【中国标准分类号】:Y50
【国际标准分类号】:35_260
【页数】:12P.;A4
【正文语种】: